More IT Forum updates

19 10 2010

I’ll post the slides from today’s IT Forum when they’re available, but in the meantime here’s what I thought was the most important news from Jim Franceschelli’s talk on “Desktops of the Future”:

  • Windows 7 will be rolling out around November, since Windows XP Extended Support is ending.  IR computers will get the rollout first (probably this month).
  • IR will be setting up standard user accounts on University-owned computers.  These user accounts will limit what applications users can install, in order to make the campus more secure.  MOST applications will be blocked, but some whitelisted applications (e.g., iTunes) will be allowed.  This has me a little concerned – it seems like an area where we’ll need a lot of communication between IR and faculty to make sure that faculty can download and install the applications they need on their desktops.
  • IR will also soon be rolling out Active Directory, a tool that will sync your Windows account – so that you’ll be able to access to mapped drives, etc from any computer on campus.
  • IR is encouraging everyone to delete any personally identifiable information (PII) from their computers.  A tool called Identity Finder will be rolled out soon that will try to locate what it thinks is PII on your desktop and then give you the option to delete or encrypt it.
  • Remote desktop assistance will be available soon – this will allow IR staff members to remotely connect to your system, making repairs faster and making the TSC more efficient.
  • The University is heading towards a virtual desktop environment (where all data is stored on Royal Drive and access to your “desktop” is via a thin client on a terminal).  IR already has the thin client and will be testing it later this month.  The current plan is to set up a prototype lab in January to be tested by users in Spring 2011.




UofS Email is headed for the Cloud

19 10 2010

At today’s IT Forum, Jim announced that University email will be moving to the cloud and that email and calendaring services will be integrated.

The two service providers under consideration are Google and Microsoft Live.  The official word is that more information will be available in 30-45 days.  Jeremy and I will work on getting some more information on what vendor has been chosen and when the transition will be so that faculty will have plenty of time to prepare.

There was a lot of other news discussed at the Forum, so I’ll be posting again later this afternoon with more updates and hopefully with a link to the slides.

As usual, let us know your comments and feedback!





Want a chance to Win an iPad?!

6 10 2010

Then go to my.scranton.edu and change your password!

As October is National Cyber Security Month, the folks over at IR are providing us with an incentive to help shore-up the security holes in our university.  One of the biggest holes is old passwords.  As per the mailer that I received in my mailbox today, anyone who changes their password during the month of October is entered into a drawing for a free iPad! (Who says our IR department doesn’t support Macs! ;-) )

To do this, log in to my.scranton.edu, click on the Faculty Tab, click Self-Service UIS, and your first link should be “Change your Single Sign On Password”.  Click there, enter your old PIN, then enter your new PIN.  Your new password needs to be 9-15 characters long, with at least one letter and one number.  Add some special characters (!@#%# and the like) to make it even better!

The only thing that I want to know is… if I change my password multiple times in October do I get extra chances to win?





2010 Undergrad Catalog in PDF

28 09 2010

Just a note to say that TAG got hold of the Undergraduate Catalog in PDF format. If you prefer advising from print, you might find it useful to print out just the pages that are relevant to you and your students (departmental course offerings, your major’s curricula, etc).  We’ll post the Graduate Catalog if/when we get a copy.





Online Course Development Stipends

27 09 2010

CTLE announced this year’s Development Stipends for Online Courses today.  If you didn’t see the email or the paper notices, here’s the text of the announcement.  Don’t forget that applications are due November 1.

Note: the stipends are only available for full-time faculty.

——————————————————————————

TO: Full-Time Faculty
FROM: Charles E. Kratz, Dean of the Library & Information Fluency
SUBJECT: 2010-2011 Development Stipends for Online Courses
DATE: September 27, 2010
The Center for Teaching & Learning Excellence (CTLE) is pleased to announce that stipends of $5,000 are available for full-time faculty interested in obtaining funding to assist with the initial development of a 3-credit online course created on the ANGEL Course Management System or stipends of $3,000 are available for full-time faculty interested in obtaining funding to assist with the revision of a 3-credit online course currently offered on the Angel Course Management System. For courses being revised, courses must have been taught three or more years online to be eligible for the stipend. Stipends for one or two credit courses will be prorated.

Priority will be given to proposals that incorporate multimedia resources.  Faculty must have the course online by summer 2011 or fall 2011. Faculty will receive payment after the course is online and the course syllabus has been submitted to Charles Kratz, Dean of the Library & Information Fluency.

Proposals should not exceed 2 pages and must include the following information:

  • Intended audience for the online course;
  • Statement about why the course should be online and the benefits for it being online (100 words or less);
  • Course description;
  • Student learning outcomes and assessment;
  • Pedagogical approach for the use of technology in the course;
  • Plan for use of multimedia materials (e.g., audio, video, streaming materials);
  • Sample syllabus for online course that will incorporate ANGEL features (e.g., chat, discussion board);
  • Commitment to develop the course in collaboration with the CTLE Instructional Curriculum Designer and the Library Faculty Liaison to your Academic Department;
  • A specific timeline for the course development, including start and completion date;
  • Specific resources needed for the course development;
  • Letter of Support from Department Chair or Dean.

Applicants are encouraged to consult Eugeniu Grigorescu, the Associate Director of the CTLE and Instructional Curriculum Designer, prior to submitting their applications.  Proposals will be reviewed by a faculty subcommittee of the CTLE Advisory Group. All applicants will be notified in December 2010.  Faculty will have the spring and summer semesters to develop the online course(s).  Faculty will be asked to share their experiences and their course(s) with their colleagues at a CTLE workshop.  Please note that stipends are subject to taxes.

Please submit applications via campus mail to:

Charles E. Kratz, Dean of the Library & Information Fluency
Weinberg Library
Ext. 4008
kratzc1@scranton.edu

Application Deadline:
Monday, November 1, 2010





University Phishing Attempt

20 09 2010

An e-mail from “The University of Scranton” (vc@scranton.edu) with the subject “Warning” is a phishing attempt. DO NOT CLICK ANY LINKS FROM THIS EMAIL!

Notice that the links in the e-mail do NOT point to any university of scranton website. DO NOT follow any links or reply to the email address. The text of the e-mail is below.

Your web mail account will be deleted in the next 24 hours due to congestion in The University of Scranton web mail user account. However if you wish to continue using your web mail account. you will have to confirm that is a present use account by clicking the secure Link Below. The personal information requested is for the safety of your account. Please leave all information

click here:secure login

click here:email activation

Warning!!! Failure to update correctly within 24 hours of receiving this warning will lose your email permanently.
Thanks

Vice-Chancellor

Copyright ©2010 The University of Scranton





Catalog woes?

13 09 2010

The agenda for this Friday’s Faculty Senate meeting includes a discussion of the new online catalog – it seems that some faculty members and students have had difficulty using it.  If you have had or have heard about issues with the catalog, please drop us a comment or an email and let us know so we can get a sense of what’s going on and whether or not TAG should get involved. Thanks!

————————-

Update 9/14-16: Here’s some of the reported feedback we’ve started to gather, related to the catalog itself as well as how it’s integrated into the University website.

  • When you search the University’s website for information (such as faculty contact information), you keep getting directed to the catalog rather than a page (like the department’s home page) that actually has the information you need
  • It’s hard to find a click path to get to a departmental website.  Most of the links that you’d think would take you to a departmental page actually take you to the program page in the catalog.  Or there just aren’t links to department pages where you’d expect them to be (e.g., there’s no easily findable way to click through to a CAS department’s page from the CAS home page).
  • One of the faculty members involved in summer advising noted that the left hand menu in the catalog (its Table of Contents) is focused on PR needs as opposed to student needs (e.g., the first link is for Pride, Passion, Promise).  He further observed that the catalog information is very complete, but it’s not always intuitive to find – he had to call over to the PR office to figure out where to find the information he and his students needed.
  • Not exactly a problem, but an odd design decision – the University directory at the end of the catalog is essentially useless.  This may just be a holdover from the print edition, but what’s the point of a directory that doesn’t give you any contact information? It would make sense for names of Faculty of Instruction to be linked to email addresses, while their department names should be linked to their department’s web site.

————————-

Update 9/23: We got hold of the Undergraduate Catalog in PDF format.





Peer to Peer File Sharing

8 09 2010

Jerry DeSanto just e-mailed the entire university community about regulation and rules regarding peer-to-peer file sharing.

September 2010
Members of the University Community:
Greetings from the Planning and Information Resources Division — We have been hard at work during the summer months making improvements to the classrooms and computer labs, data center, enterprise applications and related services used to conduct the work of our campus community. Our technology infrastructure allows us to share resources and collaborate with each other and colleagues around the world in numerous, productive ways. I want to remind you that, while using the University’s technology resources, we have all agreed to abide by the Code of Responsible Computing and Student Computing Policy.
On July 1, 2010, final regulations from the federal government specific to the use of peer-to-peer (P2P) file sharing applications within colleges and universities took effect. Peer-to-peer file sharing is widely used to exchange files, most commonly music and video; however, the unauthorized distribution of copyrighted material may subject the individuals involved to civil and criminal penalties. In general, anyone found liable for civil copyright infringement may be ordered to pay either actual damages or “statutory” damages affixed at not less than $750 and not more than $30,000 per work infringed. For “willful” infringement, a court may award up to $150,000 per work infringed. Willful copyright infringement can also result in criminal penalties, including imprisonment of up to five years and fines of up to $250,000 per offense. Colleges and universities can be required to identify offenders within their network(s); The University of Scranton will comply with any court orders it may receive.
The University limits the amount of bandwidth allotted to peer-to-peer applications in order to ensure the availability and integrity of our network and services. In addition, we prohibit the use of those aggressive peer-to-peer applications that utilize excessive network resources or are known to carry mostly illegal content. As stated in the University’s Copyright Compliance and Peer-to-Peer File Sharing Policy , individuals who are in violation of policy will be subject to disciplinary action, which may range from written warnings, fines, counseling, and/or suspension of network access. If you have any questions about this please contact the Technology Support Center at 941-HELP (x4357).
Best wishes for a very rewarding academic year.

Sincerely,
Jerome P. DeSanto
Vice President for Planning and CIO


Jerome P. DeSanto
Vice President for Planning and Chief Information Officer
Ph: 570-941-6185
Fx: 570-941-7899
The University of Scranton
Jerome.DeSanto@scranton.edu
www.scranton.edu





Faculty/Staff Directory

18 08 2010

Human Resources, IR, and PR released a joint announcement today (on paper, through campus mail) about the Faculty/Staff Directory.  Since the directory is available online, this is the last year that a print directory will be available.

If you need to update your contact information in the directory, you can do so through my.scranton – just go to: University Links > Faculty/Staff (under Directories/Offices) > Update Your Directory Information.





EDUCAUSE Webinar on New Faculty and IT

7 07 2010

This afternoon, TAG members sat in with IT staff on an EDUCAUSE webinar titled “What Do Newer Generation Faculty Want from IT Services?”  The webinar featured two speakers from the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee: Bruce Maas, CIO (representing the IT perspective) and Michael Zimmer, assistant professor (representing the new faculty perspective).  Both Bruce and Michael stressed the importance of communication between faculty and IT and acknowledged that official campus tools “often lag behind cloud and consumer services.”  Bruce described new faculty as “impatient” and unlikely to ask permission before using unsupported tools, while Michael described the frustration of being a tech-savvy faculty member with high expectations for IT services.  The discussion essentially came down to a single question: “How do we educate each other?”

If anyone’s interested, you can find a recording and transcript of the webinar, along with Bruce and Michael’s slides, here.