IRAC on Hiatus

1 09 2010

TAG just got word that the Information Resources Advisory Committee (IRAC) will be on hiatus this semester, as IR evaluates feedback from committee members and other campus leaders about the best way to engage with the campus as a whole.

From a TAG perspective, this looks like an opportunity for the faculty to think about how technology decisions should be made at the University – that is, how faculty, staff, and students can all work with IR to get the support we need for teaching, learning, and other our University activities.  If you have thoughts on this, please feel free to post below.





2010 Faculty Questionnaire

31 08 2010

TAG is running a survey of all faculty on campus this week, with a goal of figuring out the best way to communicate with faculty about their technology needs.  If you’re a UofS faculty member, please check your email for the survey link!  We’ll be posting the survey results here and discussing them in our next meeting.





TAG Discussion List

23 08 2010

One of TAG’s goals is to facilitate discussions about technology issues on campus, particularly as they relate to teaching and research.  TAG-Discussion is an email listserv where faculty can share questions, solutions, concerns, and suggestions about technology on campus.

While TAG-Discussion focuses on faculty use of technology, the list is open subscription, so anyone in the University community is welcome to join.

If you’d like to subscribe, go to royallists.scranton.edu and log in with your Scranton account information.

Under “Mail List Categories,” click “Faculty”, then “tag-discussion@royallists.scranton.edu”.  On the left side, under “List Operations”, click “Subscribe”, then OK on the dialog box.  Note that you can also set the list to deliver one email per day as a digest, rather than receiving each email individually.  To set that up, click on “Subscription Options” and select “digest plain text format” in the top drop down menu.

To post to the list, just send an email to tag-discussion@royallists.scranton.edu. Your post will be distributed to the list after it is approved by the list moderator (currently, Kristen).  The discussion list is moderated to prevent spam or off-topic messages from clogging inboxes.

You can unsubscribe at any time by navigating back to royallists.scranton.edu, logging in, clicking on that list from the link on the left, and clicking on “Unsubscribe” from the list options.





Meeting Summary 8/19

19 08 2010

TAG met for the first time today and had a very productive meeting.  Our main questions for discussion were the following:

  • How do we set up lines of communication between the faculty and IR?
  • How do we communicate with and solicit feedback from the faculty as a whole?
  • How should we communicate within TAG?

And here’s what came up in discussion…

  • IT Services has been focusing on pushing announcements through the my.scranton portal (and then as secondary outlets, Bboard, mass emails to faculty).  Most committee members agreed that neither my.scranton portal nor Bboard were used frequently by faculty members.  We discussed the bureaucratic limitations on mass email to faculty.  One possible outlet for faculty communication could be a RoyalList specifically for discussion of tech issues.
  • We noted that there’s an age/ability divide among faculty on campus.  Some might still want paper notices, and only about major IT outages, while others want to know every detail and want that information through Facebook/Twitter/other social media.  How do we filter what’s relevant to faculty members and put it into terms they can understand?
  • IR often has to make decisions based on meeting the needs of the majority of campus users, sometimes at the cost of convenience to a minority of users (e.g., less support for Macs on campus since fewer people use Macs).  Often unified solutions that work campus-wide may not meet specific individual needs.
  • Compromises often have to be made, since resources are limited.  How do we explain these compromises to faculty? We can say “No” when we need to, but it should be phrased as “No, but here’s why not.”
  • Faculty often feel like they don’t have input in IR decisions.  Many times there is faculty representation on a product/project committee, but other faculty don’t know about it and feel their voice isn’t being heard.
  • Regarding the role of TAG – the group could serve as guinea pigs for testing out new classroom technologies.  We should also be keeping eyes/ears open for other faculty who are already doing this, and make sure we link to their presentations, notes, or syllabi to help other faculty learn from them.

And here’s what we decided on as next steps…

  • Set up RoyalLists for TAG-Members and TAG-Discussion, and invite any tech-interested faculty to join TAG-Discussion
  • Create a New Technologies tab on the TAG website to start sharing information about which faculty are using new technologies in the classroom
  • Invite 1st year faculty to join TAG-Discussion and give TAG feedback on the technology aspects of their transition
  • Survey FT and PT faculty on how they’d like to receive IT updates (and why)
  • Meet again after the survey results have been received and compiled




A Plan Comes Together

9 08 2010

After a long but fun summer of Northern Light-powered planning and discussion, the University of Scranton Technology Advisory Group is about to officially get on its feet and meet for the first time.  While we’re still working through everyone’s schedules to set up a meeting time, we’re excited to announce our 2010-2011 inaugural membership.  Many thanks to the faculty and staff members who have volunteered to work with us!

TAG this year will consist of…

Three faculty members from the College of Arts and Sciences:
Dr. Timothy Cannon, Psychology/Neuroscience
Prof. Teresa Grettano, English and Theatre
Dr. Jeremy Sepinsky, Physics

Two faculty members from the Panuska College of Professional Studies:
Dr. Catherine Lovecchio, Nursing
Dr. Kevin Wilkerson, Counseling and Human Services

One faculty member from the Kania School of Management (although we’re trying to recruit one more):
Dr. S. P. Chattopadhyay, Management/Marketing

One faculty librarian from the Weinberg Memorial Library:
Prof. Kristen Yarmey-Tylutki, Digital Services Librarian

And two staff members representing Planning & Information Resources and the Center for Teaching and Learning Excellence, respectively:
James Franceschelli, Director of IT Services
Eugeniu Grigorescu, Associate Director, CTLE

We’ll start off by figuring out how to build communication bridges between faculty and IR, and by deciding how TAG fits in with other University committees and services. Let us know if you have any questions or suggestions!





Faculty Senate, Meet TAG

11 05 2010

The UofS Technology Advisory Group will make its official debut at 3:15pm this Friday, May 11, 2010 at the monthly meeting of the Faculty Senate in Brennan 500.  We’ll be discussing TAG’s purpose, goals, and next steps, and we’ll also be soliciting recommendations for new members.  All full-time faculty members are invited to attend.

TAG is designed to be a flexible advisory group, sponsored by the Faculty Senate and reporting to the Senate’s Academic Support Committee.   Many thanks to outgoing Senate President Rob Waldeck for helping us get started, and we’re looking forward to working with incoming President Gerry Biberman!