Guidelines for Faculty Input on Technology Decisions

9 12 2010

Once upon a time, there was a policy that became a Memorandum of Understanding that then became a set of guidelines.  Hopefully, the name of this document won’t change any more, since we think it’s finally done.  Well, for now.

After everyone we talked to universally agreed that an informal approach would be best, we decided to rename TAG’s first drafted policy as the “Guidelines for Faculty Input on Technology Decisions.” They’re posted here on the TAG website, and their purpose is to codify the shared expectations between the faculty and any administrative bodies that are responsible for technology resources on campus.  They’ve been reviewed by representatives from the Faculty Senate, Information Resources, Academic Affairs, and the Faculty Affairs Council.

Since the Guidelines aren’t an official policy, they can’t exactly be enforced – but we hope that they will serve as a useful model both for faculty members interested in providing feedback on technology decisions as well as administrative bodies interested in getting faculty feedback.

Here’s hoping that this language will help improve communication about technology decisions across campus.  Thanks to everyone who gave us feedback, and as usual, let us know if you have any questions.





Faculty Communication with IR: Putting it Down on Paper

29 11 2010

The biggest action item TAG has been working on so far this semester is improving communication between faculty members and IR.  Over the past few weeks, a few TAG members got together and took a stab at codifying how TAG can facilitate faculty feedback into technology decisions.  This isn’t a TAG mission statement, since it’s only one of our group’s original goals, but it’s a way to formalize one aspect of our work.

On the advice of IR, we’re thinking of calling this document a “Memorandum of Understanding” rather than an official policy, because we’re not sure that it’s appropriate to send through the whole University Governance structure.  However, we’re still thinking of sending it to the Faculty Senate Academic Support committee for review and discussion (Jeremy and Kristen will be meeting with Jack Beidler to get his thoughts on this move).

We’d like to hear feedback on this draft of the document.  Please let us know what you think about the text as well as if/how you’d like to see it implemented on campus.  Thanks!