Mac OS X Mountain Lion Incompatability

31 07 2012

Attention MAC Users!

There is a known issue with the new Mac Operating System, “Mountain Lion”, which prevents connection to the university network through Cisco Clean Access.

Therefore, at the present time, If you upgrade to “Mountain Lion” you will not be able to access the internet while at The University of Scranton!!

IT Services is working on resolving this issue, and we will update you with a timeframe as soon as one is available. We recommend waiting to upgrade your operating system until such time as IT Services resolves this issue.





TAG Meeting Notes 3/6/12

8 03 2012

TAG held its second Spring 2012 meeting on Tuesday.

Online Course Evaluations:

  • We started the meeting with a discussion about online course evaluations.  Jerry Muir, as a representative from the Course Evaluation Committee, led the discussion.
  • The Course Evaluation Committee is concerned about decreasing response rates for the evaluations. In the last two semesters, the overall response rate was below 60%.
  • Response rates were higher (~80%) when students had to complete evaluations in order to see their final grades. But this policy had some serious problems – e.g., students were sometimes completing the evaluations after taking their final exam, or they would rush through the evaluations just to see their grades.
  • The Course Evaluation Committee is looking for ideas to improve response rates for online evaluations. One idea under discussion is to ask faculty to grant students 15 minutes of class time during the last week of class to complete the online evaluations in class. Students could use mobile devices like laptops, tablets, or smartphones – although smartphones wouldn’t really facilitate comments, which many faculty find to be the most valuable part of the evaluation.
  • S.P. suggested that course evaluations could be tied into the Passport system for KSOM students. Sandy and Teresa agreed that the Passport system under development in PCPS might be useful in the same way.
  • Dave pointed out that the current structure of the online evaluations doesn’t necessarily fit for online courses (e.g., there are questions about “classroom management”).  There should either be separate evaluation forms for online vs. traditional classes, or the questions should be standardized to meet both situations.

Standing Committees:

IRAC

  • IRAC (the Information Resources Advisory Council) met on February 16 and discussed the idea of a service catalog that would outline what services IR provides and set expectations for both the providers and the recipients of those services.  This is still under development and will be brought back to IRAC in the fall.

Learning Management System (LMS) Work Group

  • The LMS Work Group brought three vendors (Desire2Learn, MoodleRooms, and Blackboard) to campus for demonstrations. The demos were open to the University community.
  • Attendees at the demonstrations were invited to complete evaluation forms. The average evaluation scores for Blackboard and Desire2Learn were relatively close, while MoodleRooms’ score was further behind.
  • The next step is to obtain sandbox versions of each system for demonstration and experimentation.  CTLE has asked some of the faculty participants in the LMS Work Group for sample course content to use for the sandboxes.
  • S.P. mentioned that DelTech, the vendor that hosts the KSOM and PCPS online-only programs, is moving from Angel to Moodle (that is, their own customized version of Moodle, not MoodleRooms). Instructors who teach both online and in-person versions of a course would have to navigate two different LMSes.

Information Management Advisory Committee (IMAC)

  • TAG does not have a sitting representative on IMAC, but Jeremy and Kristen have been invited to recent meetings since there are new policies under development that would affect faculty.
  • At a February 13 meeting, IR introduced two new policies under development: a Privacy & Confidentiality Statement and the Employee Separation Procedures document.
  • The “Privacy & Confidentiality Statement” is still in rough draft form. It is intended to describe how staff members in the Planning & Information Resources division will handle electronic information, in compliance with the Information Classification Policy and other information management standards. IR asked for feedback from IMAC members and will release the next draft of the Statement for wider review.
  • The “Employee Separation Procedures: Information Resources” document outlines the divisional procedures that IR staff will follow when an employee (faculty or staff) member separates from the University.  The procedures address the departing employee’s access to information resources, including hardware, email, Royal Drive data storage, etc.   TAG briefly discussed the idea of having a checklist of technology items (for example, data transfer, email forwarding) that faculty should prepare for or be aware of prior to a separation. Sandy and Kristen will ask Anne Marie if and how a technology checklist could be incorporated into the Academic Affairs separation procedures.

Previous Action Items

Incidental Use Policy

  • Jeremy and Kristen presented a draft of the Incidental Use Policy to Faculty Senate on February 10, with Robyn Dickinson and Tony Maszeroski representing IR.  Robyn and Tony will take the input from the Faculty Senate discussion (mostly clarifications in the policy language) into consideration for the next draft of the policy.

Academic Technology Plan

  • At the February 10 Faculty Senate meeting, Hal reported that the Academic Technology Plan was essentially dead in the water since there is no budget to support it.
  • TAG members agreed that the Plan should drive a technology budget, rather than the reverse. [The same conclusion was agreed upon at the Deans’ Group half-day retreat last spring.] A plan is needed to establish goals and vision, which in turn are needed in order for progress to be assessed.
  • Jeremy and Kristen will work with Anne Marie to figure out next steps for writing and implementing a Plan.

New Business

Leahy Hall and classroom technology

  • Our discussion of the Academic Technology Plan led into a discussion about the new PCPS building to be constructed on the Leahy Hall site.
  • TAG would like there to be a consistent faculty voice on classroom technology issues during new construction or renovation. TAG had some input into classroom mediation decisions in the Loyola Science Center, but not on a consistent, continued basis.
  • Sandy and Teresa will explore this idea with Deb Pellegrino as planning for the new building begins.  Dave has been already providing classroom technology input on the St. Thomas renovations.

Networking computers and desktop sharing

  • TAG received a complaint from a faculty member about the difficulties involved in setting up desktop sharing between a faculty computer (on the faculty virtual network) and lab classroom computers (on the student network).  IR had suggested that RoyalDrive be used instead, but that solution did not meet the faculty member’s needs.  A temporary solution has been worked out by placing the lab computers on the faculty network.  The faculty member initially requested the service in September 2011, and the temporary solution is being put in place this week.
  • We did not arrive at an action step on this complaint during the TAG meeting.

Having run out of time (as usual!), we adjourned. The next TAG meeting is scheduled for Thursday, April 12, from 10:00am-11:15am in WML305.





CMS Changes

15 02 2012

Our school’s official website will be making a change from “matrix.scranton.edu” to the more canonical “www.scranton.edu”. This will not have any affect on your web browsing experience, but it may affect some pages created in the Content Management System (CMS). Any links currently pointing to a “matrix.scranton.edu/” site will be automatically redirected to the corresponding “www.scranton.edu/” site, but IR would like to encourage you update your websites (and republish) to reflect this change. The full email from IR is below, including dates that the change will take place.

Please note: please refrain from publishing websites during the upgrade window: 4:30 p.m. on Thursday, February 15, 2012 until 8:30 a.m. on Friday, February 16

On Thursday, February 16, 2012, the University’s public web server, known as matrix.scranton.edu will be replaced by a new server, which will be known as www.scranton.edu. No interruption in service for the University’s web site is expected as a result of this action.

As a CMS user, please take note of the following minor changes that will occur on the afternoon of Wednesday, February 15, 2012. They will affect how you navigate within the CMS and link to University pages:

1. After you log in to the CMS, the dropdown menu option, “matrix.scranton.edu”, will be renamed to “www.scranton.edu”. This is merely a name change, all website data will be retained.

2. If you created links to other pages in the CMS via the “Internal Link” option, the CMS will automatically update these links to the correct “www” address.

3. If you linked to other pages in the CMS via the “External Link” option, where you entered the full website address (i.e. matrix.scranton.edu/admissions/index.shtml), we encourage you to change these links to “www” shortly after the move on February 16, 2012. You will then need to republish your pages.

Any existing links containing “matrix” will still work, but we want to eliminate “matrix” from our web vocabulary.

4. Finally, please avoid publishing from 4:30 p.m. on Thursday, February 15, 2012 until 8:30 a.m. on Friday, February 16, 2012.

If you have any questions or concerns, please email webmaster@scranton.edu. Please forward as necessary.





The Matrix unplugged: University’s web server is being replaced

2 02 2012

Update 2/8: This server move has been postponed until next Thursday, 2/16/12.

——————-

Connie Wisdo in ITDA sent out this notice about the University’s public web server. I don’t think this change will have any effect on faculty, but please let TAG know if you have any concerns.

Connie’s announcement:

I wanted to give you advance notice of a server replacement taking place next week.  The University’s public web server, known as matrix.scranton.edu will be replaced by a new server, which will be known as www.scranton.edu.  No interruption in service for the University’s web site is expected as a result of this action.

The Public Relations office has been working closely with the PIR division over the past several months to plan this transition.  We have collectively reached out to a number of departments as we were doing this planning, to help ensure that only current web content gets moved over to the new server.

A separate notice will be posted on the my.scranton portal, to inform the University community of the action.  However, since no downtime is planned, the action will likely not be noticed by anyone.

CMS users will be notified separately of some minor changes that will occur in the CMS after the move.

The matrix server is old and outdated, and needs to be replaced.  The naming of the new server as ‘www’ will eliminate the need for many of the redirects that are currently in place (e.g.www.scranton.edu/admissions will no longer need to redirect the user tomatrix.scranton.edu/admissions).

Testing of the cutover (using a test server) is taking place on Monday (the 6th) and if any identified problems cannot be rectified before Wednesday (the 8th), the action involving the production servers will be delayed accordingly.

I asked about existing links to matrix.scranton.edu URLs.  They’ll still work:

The Systems group will set up the configuration of the new server so that it responds to eithermatrix.scranton.edu or www.scranton.edu, so it will work immediately after the move.

Further, we are going to republish the entire site in the CMS to www, so any links that were established in the CMS as “internal” links, will change automatically to www upon the republishing.  However, I would advise that you do change any hard coded links shortly thereafter, just so we can try to eliminate the term “matrix” from our web vocabulary!





Communicating about Campus-wide outages

17 11 2011

Last night, internet connectivity on campus was down between around 7:00pm to about 9:15pm.  With the network down, the only way to find out what was happening was by calling the TSC.  Jeremy and I called the TSC at different times, and we got different information about when the network was expected to be back up.

While there weren’t many faculty on campus at the time, we thought it might be a good idea to discuss communication about campus-wide outages.

In situations like this, what’s the best way for IR to update faculty about what’s happening?

Please let us know what you think.

(Many thanks again to Tim and Cal for the rescue operation!)





Campus Internet Restored

16 11 2011

Thanks to Calvin Krzywiec and Timothy Meade over at IT and some speedy after-hours response, the campus internet access has been restored. The problems started with a data center migration and an unforeseen error in the IP address routing for all off-campus traffic. These firewall problems have been resolved. If there are any remaining issues, please contact the HelpDesk (x4357) to report them.





Major Campus Internet Outage

16 11 2011

UPDATE: Campus Internet has been restored.

As of this writing (8:30 PM), internet connectivity is down for most of campus, including faculty offices, labs, and student facilities. The IT helpdesk has indicated that this is due to complications from multiple datacenter moves that are occuring simultaneously this evening. It is expected that connectivity will be restored sometime during the business day tomorrow. We will keep you posted on this blog with any new information or developments.

P.S. – this blog is NOT hosted by servers on the University of Scranton campus, and thus should remain available throught this situation.





TAG Meeting Notes 9/29/11

29 09 2011

We had our first TAG meeting of 2011-2012 this morning.  We had a lot to catch up on from the summer, so apologies for the long notes! As always, post a comment if there are any questions or concerns.

  • New members. Teresa Conte joined us from Nursing as a replacement for Cathy Lovecchio. Ben Bishop (Computing Sciences) joined us late last spring, as did Lori Nidoh (representing Public Relations). S.P. Chattopadhyay is currently on sabbatical, and Kevin Wilkerson has returned from his.
  • Novel Pedagogy Cohort. Jeremy and a few other CAS faculty members have formed a small group to explore and implement new pedagogy techniques in their classes – some of which involve technology while others don’t.  Tools to be explored include lecture capture and clicker systems. If any other faculty are interested in innovative pedagogy, let Jeremy know.
  • Lecture capture.  A team of stakeholders (including TAG members Jeremy, Kristen, Sandy, and Eugeniu) met several times in the spring and summer to review possible products for lecture capture.  The final recommendation was a hybrid solution of Media Site (as a back end) and Crestron HD appliances for the actual capture. Implementation will start in the Science Center and then spread to other departments. Right now, IR is working on setting up the back end servers while VistaComm is implementing the front end capture devices. The goal is to have LSC lecture capture ready to go by Spring 2011, and then expand to other departments next year as funding allows. Sandy and Teresa noted that Education and Nursing would be very interested in implementing lecture capture in their classrooms. Thanks to Jason Oakey over in Instructional Technology for taking the lead on this project!
  • Office 2010.  The upgrade to Office 2010 for faculty and staff is tied to the email conversion (see below) due to the incorporation of Outlook.
  • Windows 7. The upgrade to Windows 7 for faculty and staff machines currently running Windows XP is held up due to a security issue. XP users are currently admin users on their computers. While this gives us a lot of flexibility and control over our own machines, it also introduces security risks – users can accidentally install malicious code.  When we move to Windows 7, IR will change XP users’ roles from admin to standard user accounts. By default, standard users wouldn’t be able to install or delete applications, but ideally there will be a way for users to obtain temporary admin status when they need to install programs. IR is currently working out these privilege management issues, so Windows 7 deployment is pushed back to (tentatively) Spring 2011.   Wesley asked about 64 bit vs 32 bit machines – Jim said that by default new machines will be 32 bit, but faculty who need 64 bit should let him know.
  • Email conversion. The Microsoft Live @ Edu email transition has been delayed by issues with identity management (e.g., automatically assigning set permissions to new hires, and removing permissions from retirees, departing employees, etc). IR is working on a workaround plan that would let us go forward with the email conversion while temporarily skipping over identity management. IR is aware of “crunch times” in faculty schedules, so faculty email conversion will probably wait until intersession or beyond.
  • Personally identifiable information.  Ben asked about security concerns for faculty members who don’t use University email.  Jim recommends that any University business, and especially any University business that involves confidential information, be done using University services (like Angel and Royal Drive). The Identity Finder tool is available to help faculty and staff find any PII that might be on their machines. IR also has security training videos that faculty can watch to get an entry-level awareness of PII.
  • Information Resources Advisory Committee.  IRAC had been inactive for a year but is now reconstituted. IRAC members will be providing input on IR’s service portfolio. TAG members Dave, Paul, Eugeniu, and Lori will be on it as CAS faculty, PCPS faculty, CTLE, and PR representatives, respectively.
  • TechQual. IR ran this customer service survey over the summer. Preliminary results just came in, but IR is still processing them and will present them to IRAC next month.
  • Loyola Science Center. Most of the IT work in LSC is done, but there are still a few equipment issues popping up in classrooms. IR will continue working on this. Remaining projects include lecture capture, the auditorium, and RoomView, a tool that will allow Instructional Technology to monitor and maintain classroom equipment (e.g., whether or not a projector has been left on).
  • Wireless. The wireless upgrade project was approved.  Phase I (freshmen residences, the new Mulberry Street residences, and the LSC) is complete and adds 350 new WiFi points to the campus. Phase II is currently underway and will add 252 WiFi points in 21 buildings (residences, St. Thomas, and the Long Center). Phase III is scheduled for summer 2012 and will include the remaining academic and administrative buildings as well as outdoor coverage.  This is a big improvement – many thanks to the Network Infrastructure staff!
  • CTLE liaison. CTLE used to have two faculty liaisons who focused teaching and pedagogy. They have now added a third faculty liaison, TAG member Sandy Pesavento, to provide input on faculty interests and needs regarding pedagogical uses of technology.
  • Mobile access to Angel. CTLE and IR experimented with Blackboard’s iOS app for Angel, but found it to be a very limited tool, particularly for teachers (e.g., faculty can’t enter grades or interact with Angel dropboxes).  So mobile access to Angel still isn’t conveniently available at this time.
  • LMS review. Our contract with Angel expires in 2013, so a review committee will begin exploring other learning management system (LMS) options in January. Connie Wisdo in ITDA will lead the group. Eugeniu said that we might have an opportunity to use a “free” installation of Blackboard temporarily (on top of our existing Angel installation) so that faculty could try it out. Dave asked whether or not we would be able to migrate courses from Angel into a new LMS. Eugeniu said that from our current version of Angel (7.4), we could export/import single courses into Blackboard, with some imperfections. If we upgraded to v8 of Angel, we’d be able to batch migrate courses. Blackboard would also complement our Royal Card and emergency notification systems, since they’re Blackboard products (Transact and Connect), but it might not be easily tied into Banner.
  • Academic Technology Plan. The Provost’s office has no updates on the Academic Technology Plan.
  • Mobile website and app. Lori shared some analytics to give us an idea of how the mobile website and mobile app are being used. The app has been downloaded 7,604 times (mostly by iOS rather than Android devices). An in-app poll asked about the user’s identity, and 57% of the poll-takers were current students, 28% were alumni, 10% were prospective students, with faculty, staff, and other community members making up only 6%.  New app modules include Admissions and the Library (live but still being tweaked), with an Alumni module on the way. An iPad version is also on the timeline for this year, and hopefully mobile authentication is on the horizon.  The m.scranton mobile site is getting plenty of traffic. The most commonly viewed mobile pages are the home page and the admissions and academics home pages. [Note: Stats on the mobile app are here (in PDF). Stats on the mobile site are here (also in PDF).] PR is also setting up automatic redirects from the full site to the mobile site for recognized mobile devices – right now, the only active redirect is from the full site home page to the m.scranton home page.
  • Faculty websites. We’ve figured out a good workflow for faculty websites with CTLE. Any faculty member who wants to create a new website in the CMS should contact Aileen McHale in the CTLE. The CTLE TechCons will set up the faculty member’s web space, and then can help him or her as needed with templates or other support.  Sandy and Anne Marie would like to encourage faculty members (and any other page admins) to keep their websites current.
  • Continuing education. TAG members interested in learning more about academic uses of technology should keep an eye out for continuing education opportunities, since funding may be available. Jeremy and Sandy will each attend a day of the EDUCAUSE conference, courtesy of the Provost’s office.  Anne Marie and a few representatives from IR will also attend. TAG members who do participate in continuing education are asked to report back and share conference highlights.
  • Computerized testing. Teresa reported on concerns from the Nursing department. Nursing licensing exams are all online, so the department uses computerized testing to help their students prepare for the licensing environment.  Nursing faculty have run into trouble finding places to conduct their computer tests – there isn’t enough space to accommodate large classes, and classrooms that do accommodate that many students have been booked for other courses.  An ideal solution would be a large “shared resource” lab (possibly run by CTLE/Library) that faculty could schedule for tests, with computers set up to restrict access to the testing environment. Anne Marie suggested that we look at how other schools have solved this problem. Teresa will get more details on Nursing needs. Jim asked if other departments have this need, and for what class sizes. Once we have more information, we can agree on a good solution and then seek funding.
  • Our next meeting will be October 27. TAG members are asked to keep collecting (specific!) feedback from other faculty members on technology concerns or issues, and we’ll keep sharing information here as projects continue.

——

Note: Updated 10/24/11 with PDF docs of mobile app and website statistics shared during the meeting.





Snapshot: How students are using the network

23 09 2011

To help TAG get an idea of how current students are using the internet on campus, Cal over in Network Infrastructure sent me some quick stats on student connections (from live snapshots taken at around 4:30pm on a weekday).

Student connections to the campus network:

Wireless: 2617
Wired: 181
Game consoles (wired): 103

OS/device breakdown of all of the students using wireless (from a slightly later snapshot):

Mac: 914
Windows: 1074
iPhone: 499
iPad: 54
iPod: 1
Linux: 67

No huge surprises here, but it’s interesting to see just how much our students rely on wireless – and it’s good to know that we have this kind of data available.

(Thanks, Cal!)





Good news for iPad users

3 05 2011

Heads up if you’ve tried to use an iPad on campus wireless. Network Infrastructure passed along some good news this morning:

We have received feedback from a number of users regarding the frequency in which iPads have to authenticate to ROYALAIR and how this is causing issues accessing some services from their device. This behavior is due to the unique way in which the iPads manage their wireless connections in that the device disconnects from the wireless network when the device is in a sleep state. Due to a low heartbeat timer in Cisco NAC, the device is decertified from the network while in this sleep state. In order to prevent this from occurring, we have increased this timer to 8 hours so that a user only needs to authenticate once during business hours. Please continue to provide us with any feedback you may have regarding this or any other iPad network issue.

Thanks to Cal and the rest of Network Infrastructure for the fix!