Present: Jeremy Sepinsky, Katy Meier, Jennifer Cutsforth, Tara Fay, Jessica Nolan
Present: Jeremy Sepinsky, Katy Meier, Jennifer Cutsforth, Patrick Clark, Jessica Nolan, Brian Conniff
At the end of the 2011-2012 school year, we provided the following memo to the Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences about our activities through the year.
———-
MEMORANDUM
To: Brian Conniff, CAS Dean
From: Patrick Clark, Jennifer Cutsforth, Tara Fay, Katy Meier, Jessica Nolan,
Jeremy Sepinsky
Date: August 15, 2012
RE: Pedagogy Cohort Update
We are writing to provide you with the year-to-date progress of our pedagogy cohort along with our recommendations for moving forward.
In the past year, our group has met more than a dozen times and has accomplished the following:
Going forward, we would like to request continuing support for our cohort. We think of this group as a learning community. and have built a foundation of trust and respect for one another in the past year. As such, we have agreed that we do not want to add additional faculty to our cohort. We feel that a small group of faculty that remains together over time provides a more solid foundation for growth, experimentation with novel pedagogies, and peer evaluation. Thus, rather than adding additional faculty to our current group we would like to recommend that one or more additional groups be formed, based on faculty interest. We are happy to provide your office with advice on how to structure these new faculty cohorts and to share our experience of what worked in our group.
Welcome to our blog! This is the blog for the Novel Pedagogy Group at The University of Scranton (Sometimes called the Pedagogy Cohort). This group continues to be funded through the Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences. We have been having regular lunch meetings for nearly two years now, and finally have a place to publicly collect our thoughts. The group was formed as a way to bring together faculty interested in exploring and learning new teaching methods, and otherwise improving their performance in the classroom. This blog is a place for us to post some of our discussions, as well as the resources and materials that we’ve collected as we go along. Our intent is to continue to post that material and those discussion, inviting comments and feedback from the larger community. We hope to encourage other faculty everywhere to explore and experiment with new teaching practices in this everchanging world of high education.
We also recognize, of course, that The University of Scranton is a unique community with unique challenges and opportunities. Every student population is different and faces different challenges. We hope that the casual reader my find some insight to help them explore these pedagogical practices in their own classroom.
We we received renewed for the 2012-2013 school year to continue our discussion groups. Here is the proposal submitted to the Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences.
———-
Dr. Brian Conniff
Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences
The University of Scranton
Scranton, PA 18510
Re: Continuation of the transformative pedagogy cohort
Dear Dr. Conniff:
At an institution like The University of Scranton, teaching and pedagogy takes the highest priority for members of the faculty. Our university is driven and sustained by quality education delivered to quality students. In order to capitalize and build upon that priority, the undersigned faculty, are seeking resources to continue their exploration of enhancing the classroom experience for both faculty and student. Below, we list some of the things that we feel are important to improving that experience, as well as some of the goals that our cohort achieved by the start of the Fall 2012 academic semester.
Regular Pedagogy Lunch Meetings
One of the most valuable aspects of a cohort such as this has been the free-sharing of ideas. We plan to have lunch meetings twice a month to discuss our experiences, experiments, and ideas regarding pedagogy. At these meetings, we will also plan the group’s activities and check on each other’s progress.
External Speakers
We would like to bring in experienced pedagogy researchers who are studying methods that we will consider incorporating in our classes. We are interested in working with the Center for Teaching and Learning Excellence (CTLE) in making these events open to the university community. Last year’s speaker (Benjamin R. Cohen of Lafayette College) drew 20 attendees.
Peer Classroom Evaluation
We found that one of the most useful things to improve our teaching has been honest, constructive, peer evaluation of our classroom performance. We arrange regular classroom visits from other cohort members to evaluate our teaching methods. Dr. Meier and Professor Fay plan to use Stephen Brookfield’s Critical Incident Questionnaire in their classrooms this Fall. This questionnaire is designed to allow the professor to determine how their students are experiencing their learning as well as the professor’s teaching. Dr. Sepinsky is piloting the new lecture capture capabilities in LSC and will be exploring these for both evaluative and pedagogical purposes.
Videotaped Class Sessions for Evaluative Purposes
Similar to the peer evaluations above, we like to evaluate our own teaching styles from a third-person perspective. Last year, we video recorded at least one lecture per group member and viewed it as a group to provide constructive criticism. We will continue this process this year.
Conference/Webinar Attendance
There are a number of conferences and webinars available which focus specifically on teaching and learning. We hope that each member can attend at one conference focusing on novel teaching methods during the 2011-2012 academic year.
Books and other Pedagogy Resources
There are a number of physical, electronic, and/or technological resources that can be used to transform the classroom into a more interactive and useful learning environment. We are seeking support in each of these ways for materials that would be guided by our conference attendance and pedagogy research.
Resource List/Wiki
We feel it is important to document our progress and will be creating a wiki or similar resource page to make it available to any other interested persons in the university community.
2011-2012 Budget Estimate
Conference Travel $XXXX
Speakers Travel $XXXX
Speakers Honoraria $XXXX
Lunch for cohort $XXXX
Books for cohort $XXXX
Total $XXXX
Sincerely,
Jeremy Sepinsky
Tara Fay
Kathryn Shively Meier
Patrick Clark
Jessica Nolan
Jennifer Cutsforth
The below is our original proposal to Brian Conniff, the Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences at The University of Scranton. We had previously discussed the idea of creating this group with him, and he was in general support of it from the start. We list below our plans for the group from its first inception.
————
Dr. Brian Conniff
Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences
The University of Scranton
Scranton, PA 18510
Re: Creation of a transformative pedagogy cohort
Dear Dr. Conniff
At an institution like The University of Scranton, teaching and pedagogy takes the highest priority for members of the faculty. Our university is driven and sustained by quality education delivered to quality students. In order to capitalize and build upon that priority, a number of faculty (the undersigned) are seeking resources to enhance the classroom experience for both faculty and student. Below, we list some of the things that we feel are important to improving that experience, as well as some of the goals that our cohort expects to achieve by the start of the Fall 2012 academic semester.
Regular Pedagogy Lunch Meetings
One of the most valuable parts of a cohort such as this is the free-sharing of ideas. We would like to have lunch meetings once or twice a month to discuss our experiences, experiments, and ideas regarding pedagogy. At these meetings, we will also plan the group’s activities and check on each other’s progress.
External Speakers
We would like to bring in experienced pedagogy researchers who are studying methods that we will consider incorporating in our classes. We would be interested in working with the Center for Teaching and Learning Excellence (CTLE) in making these events open to the university community.
Peer Classroom Evaluation
We feel that one of the most useful things to improve our teaching is honest, constructive, peer evaluation of our classroom performance. We plan to arrange regular classroom visits from other cohort members to evaluate our teaching methods.
Videotaped Class Sessions for Evaluative Purposes
Similar to the peer evaluations above, we would like to evaluate our own teaching styles from a third-person perspective. We plan to record at least one lecture per group member each semester and view it as a group to provide constructive criticism.
Conference Attendance
There are a number of conferences available which focus specifically on teaching and learning. We hope that each member can attend at least one conference focusing on novel teaching methods during the 2011-2012 academic year.
Books and other Pedagogy Resources
There are a number of physical, electronic, and/or technological resources that can be used to transform the classroom into a more interactive and useful learning environment. We are seeking support in each of these ways for materials that would be guided by our conference attendance and pedagogy research.
Resource List/Wiki
We feel it is important to document our progress and will be creating a wiki or similar resource page to make it available to any other interested persons in the university community.
Produce a Usable Classroom Product
We expect each member of the cohort to create usable course materials. To have the greatest impact on the teaching and learning culture of the university, we plan to focus on some part of the core requirements taught by our respective departments. By creating a course (or module for said course) based on a novel pedagogy, we can share that with other individuals for evaluations and/or implementation.
Implementation and Evaluation of the Novel Pedagogy
By the start of the 2012-2013 academic year, we expect to have course materials developed for implementation. Before we can finalize our classroom product and give it to other members of our departments for use, we need to evaluate it properly. We intend to collaboratively evaluate each other’s classroom product upon implementation during the 2012-2013 academic year.
2011-2012 Budget Estimate
Conference Travel $XXXX
Speakers Travel $XXXX
Speakers Honoraria $XXXX
Lunch for cohort $XXXX
Books for cohort $XXXX
Total $XXXX
Sincerely,
Jeremy Sepinsky
Tara Fay
Kathryn Shively Meier
Patrick Clark
Jessica Nolan
Jennifer Cutsforth